My Digital Seminary

Menu Menu

Tag: Walking through Romans

Why is Paul Under Obligation to “Greeks and Barbarians” and Not Just “Gentiles”?

The doctrinal depth of Romans can make it easy to overlook the question of why even Paul wrote it. Why this letter to this church at this time? We’re familiar with the problems in the Corinthian church inspiring 1 Corinthians and the Judaizing influence behind the letter to the Galatians, but is Romans simply an arbitrary theological treatise? Is it Paul’s systematic theology?

 » Read the entire post: Why is Paul Under Obligation to “Greeks and Barbarians” and Not Just “Gentiles”?  »

Why Choose Abraham for Romans 4?

Romans ArcRomans 4 is about Abraham and how his saving faith is a paradigm for our own saving faith. But why choose Abraham? Why not Moses, David, Zechariah, Joshua, or any of the other faithful men of God in the OT? Why Abraham?

 » Read the entire post: Why Choose Abraham for Romans 4?  »

The Gentiles Who “Do What the Law Requires”: Unbelievers or Believers? (Rom 2:12-16)

Romans ArcWhen I first heard that Romans 2 is one the most difficult chapters in the book I have to admit I was surprised, however having studied and taught through it, I can now wholeheartedly agree! While the overall thrust of Romans 2 is easily discerned – Jews are also without excuse before God (Rom 2:1) – the difficulty is in the details.

 » Read the entire post: The Gentiles Who “Do What the Law Requires”: Unbelievers or Believers? (Rom 2:12-16)  »

Why Paul Condemns the Gentiles in Romans 1 by Quoting a Text About Israel

Romans 1:18-32 is often understood as Paul’s indictment of the Gentiles, with Rom 2:1-3:20 addressing the Jews. This is certainly correct since those in Rom 1:18-32 have limited revelation and pursue behaviours that Gentiles often embraced but Jews rejected. While, Romans 2-3:20 addresses those under the law, circumcision, etc.

 » Read the entire post: Why Paul Condemns the Gentiles in Romans 1 by Quoting a Text About Israel  »

The Structure of Romans: A Comparison of Commentaries

I thought it would be interesting to compare the different ways various commentaries structure Paul’s letter to the Romans. I’m only working with the commentaries I have access to, so this is not a comparison of the major commentaries by any means. Secondly, I’m only giving the basic outline; some commentaries have very detailed outlines but I’m just giving the big picture they present, or this post would become unwieldy very quickly! Then I’ll offer a few observations about the similarities and differences.

 » Read the entire post: The Structure of Romans: A Comparison of Commentaries  »